| |

Belgian Business Seminar in Hong Kong 2023

    • Economic losses are piling up, impacting all stakeholders.
    • Transition is key to prosperity, and likely the least costly scenario.
    • Social risks/issues are closely interlinked with geopolitical and economic risks.
    • Tension between capital and labor is increasing.
    • Companies and/or investors may not be prepared and convinced by the urgency of the climate risk situation.
    • Policy makers and the asset management industry are gradually understanding the urgency and aligning
      across geographies and stakeholders. However, the alignment should be accelerated.
    • Sustainable finance (ESG 2.0) will play a key role in the future.

    In conclusion on ESG, Mr De Coensel mentioned that:
    On Environment: Urgent action is required. Both the investment challenges and opportunities are present across geographies and likely most favourable under a 1.5°C scenario.
    On Social: Social issues are increasingly integrated in sustainable investment concepts and regulation, interlinked with economic/geopolitical risks.
    On Governance: Current investment in environment fields requires proper knowledge and integration by boards and investors.

    And finally, this first part finished with 3 important take-aways:

    • Capital markets need to continue the journey to mobilize… innovate, improve, revise, increase! ESG 2.0 is a continuously evolving concept.
    • ESG pushback school has no merit – comprehensive ESG factor integration is becoming mainstream, part of the duty of care and the fiduciary duty.
    • Data availability and quality will accelerate across financial and non-financial corporates, enhancing ESG risk and opportunities management.

    Following this introductory presentation, a panel discussion was moderated by Alexandra Tracy, Founder and President of Hoi Ping Ventures, which provides research and consulting on investment in low-carbon energy and infrastructure in Asian emerging markets. In addition to Peter De Coensel, the following people took part in the panel:

    • Frank Vandenborre, Group Director Sustainability, AGEAS insurance group.
    • Qian Li, Senior Corporate Communication Director, ABInbev beer conglomerate.
    • Diana Tang, Director, Sustainable Finance, Asia Pacific, ING bank.

    The panel started by giving an overview of the current status of sustainable finance in Asia and globally, and what needs to be done to scale up sustainable financing flows. When speaking about product innovation tomobilize sustainable capital, the panel referred to “blended finance” – bringing together capital from public institutions, like development banks, together with the private sector to finance projects. Finally, the participants covered the accusations of greenwashing (claiming too much) and greenhushing (not saying anything) about the financial institutions’ sustainability credentials.

    In the third and final part, the audience listened to the keynote speech on Climate and the International Organisation of Securities Commissions by Jean-Paul Servais. He mentioned that the International
    Sustainability Standards Board’s standards were “fit for purpose” and had responded to the demand from ordinary investors (so-called John and Mary) and from fund managers for more certainty on companies’
    sustainability claims to stamp out greenwashing. In fact, the goal is to reach the same standards that apply to financial reporting to sustainability requirements. By implementing those rigorous standards, IOSCO will help investors get access to better data to evaluate the risks that changes in the climate are creating to businesses.

    This speech was followed by a fireside chat with Julia Leung, CEO of The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong and Jean-Paul Servais (FSMA* – IOSCO*), moderated by Mushtaq Kapasi, Managing
    Director and Chief Representative for Asia-Pacific of the International Capital Market Association (ICMA). SFC, established in 1989, is an independent statutory body that regulates Hong Kong’s securities and futures markets. In response to the questions by Mr Kapasi, Ms Leung declared that the SFC was looking closely at what regulators were doing on ESG standards, especially in Europe. She mentioned also that markets and countries are not equal and do not have the same needs. Consequently, the ESG standards must be flexible enough to allow listed companies and SMEs to respond to the questions of the investors in that field.

    The seminar ended by gathering in separate “one to one” or small group talks.